Apparently, 800 Calories Wasn’t a Sustainable Nutrition Plan
It worked, which was the problem. Eating 800 to 1,000 calories a day took the weight off and made food the enemy. From our co-founder, who now eats more than 2,000 a day and is still losing fat — and on what changed.
Jordan Woods, CEO & Co-Founder, AION Sculpts ·
For a while, I was really good at losing weight.
I was also really good at barely eating.
Some days I was somewhere between 800 and 1,000 calories.
And here’s the inconvenient part:
It worked.
I lost a substantial amount of weight.
The problem arrived when I tried to live like a normal human again.
I’d eat more normally and gain it back — substantially. Eventually, eating itself started to scare me.
Food came with guilt.
Eating more came with shame.
Eating less felt like success.
That’s a pretty shitty relationship to have with something you need to survive.
Then I hired a trainer
I eventually had fitness goals I couldn’t reach on my own, so I hired someone who knew significantly more than I did.
When he asked how much I was eating and I told him, he damn near keeled over.
Then he told me I needed to eat more.
Fantastic. The one thing I was terrified to do.
My lived experience had taught me a very convincing lesson:
Eat less → lose weight.
Eat more → gain it back.
Now I was supposed to trust this person telling me to do the opposite?
I’d hired him because what I knew had taken me as far as it could. So I trusted him.
Losing weight and building a body aren’t the same goal
Over time, my calories went up. I started resistance training with purpose. Protein became a serious part of my nutrition.
Eventually I was eating around 1,600 calories a day — an amount that once would have terrified me.
Today I eat more than 2,000 calories a day. And I’m still losing fat.
Read that again from the perspective of someone who once believed 800 calories was the only thing standing between her and gaining weight.
That is not because eating more magically causes fat loss. It doesn’t. Energy balance still matters.
It’s because I finally learned the goal was never to eat the least amount of food I could survive on.
The goal was to give my body enough to train, recover, build and keep muscle — and to use an approach I could actually live with while working toward body-composition goals.
Over that earlier period, my measurements showed something I still find pretty remarkable:
20 pounds of fat lost.
20 pounds of muscle gained.
That’s my result, not a promise of what someone else will experience.
It changed the way I thought about food.
Your body actually needs fuel
There’s a larger principle here, and some science behind it.
When we lose weight, energy needs drop in part because there is simply less body to maintain. Restriction and weight loss can also produce an extra drop in energy expenditure known as adaptive thermogenesis. The size of that effect varies a lot between people. Better-designed studies often find a smaller or less durable effect, especially after weight has stabilized. That’s one reason I don’t describe what happened to me as having “broken” or “destroyed” my metabolism.1
There’s another problem with chasing the lowest possible calorie number: weight loss is not automatically fat loss. Without the right training and nutrition, lean tissue can leave too.
Resistance training gives your body a reason to keep and build muscle. Protein supplies the amino acids that process needs. A large meta-analysis of resistance-training studies found that higher protein intake improved gains in muscle mass and strength, with the average benefit leveling off around 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day in the populations studied.2
Energy matters too. Building tissue, recovering from training, running ordinary physiology, and getting through a day all cost fuel.
Food isn’t just what’s standing between you and a smaller number on the scale.
It’s also what you’re asking your body to build with.
A smaller number isn’t the whole story
My old approach didn’t fail because it couldn’t make me smaller.
It obviously could.
It failed because I couldn’t live there.
Somewhere along the way I’d started treating food like the enemy instead of fuel.
That does not mean the answer is simply eat more. If fat loss is the goal, an energy deficit still matters.
The lesson for me was different:
The goal isn’t to eat as little as possible. It’s to eat appropriately for what you’re asking your body to do.
Today I’m trying to build muscle. I have physique goals. I care about composition.
So I eat accordingly.
I train accordingly.
And protein has become a rather ridiculous part of my life.
This is part of why we built AION Sculpts
Nutrition should not be reduced to eat less and move more.
Someone trying to lose fat while keeping muscle does not need the same plan as someone trying to gain muscle, improve performance, or just eat like a person again.
Your goals matter.
Your training matters.
The foods you’ll actually eat matter.
Your real life definitely matters.
That’s part of what AION is built around. He adapts nutrition to the person — goals, training, schedule, the foods they will eat — instead of treating the lowest calorie number as an achievement.
Under-fueling is not a badge of honor.
I had to learn that one the hard way.
Which brings me to egg whites.
At one point during this stretch, someone asked how many egg whites I was eating.
I proudly answered:
“Three tablespoons.”
She laughed.
Apparently I was playing with the big dogs now.
We measure egg whites in cups.
These days I drink two of them.
We’ll talk about that next. It’s going to require some explanation.
And frozen berries.
References
- Nunes CL, et al. Does adaptive thermogenesis occur after weight loss in adults? A systematic review. British Journal of Nutrition. 2022;127(3):451–469.
- Morton RW, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training–induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. British Journal of Sports Medicine.2018;52(6):376–384.
This article is the author’s own experience and general education. It is not medical, psychological, or dietary advice for any individual. If you are struggling with your relationship with food, please talk to a doctor, a registered dietitian, or a licensed mental health professional.
Common questions
- Why did I gain the weight back after eating 800 calories a day?
- Because a plan that only works while you are barely eating stops working the moment you try to live normally. In the author’s case, eating 800 to 1,000 calories a day took a substantial amount of weight off, and eating normally again brought it back — and food started to come with guilt and fear. The approach failed because she could not live there, not because it could not make her smaller.
- Can you eat more and still lose fat?
- Eating more does not cause fat loss, and energy balance still matters — if fat loss is the goal, a deficit is still part of it. What changed for the author was the goal itself: fueling enough to train, recover, and keep and build muscle, at a level she could sustain. Today she eats more than 2,000 calories a day and is still losing fat, up from a period at 800 to 1,000.
- Does dieting break your metabolism?
- The author does not describe it that way. Energy needs drop with weight loss partly because there is less body to maintain, and restriction can add an extra drop known as adaptive thermogenesis. That effect varies a lot between people, and better-designed studies often find it smaller or less durable, especially once weight stabilizes.
- How much protein do you need to build muscle?
- A large meta-analysis of resistance-training studies found higher protein intake improved gains in muscle mass and strength, with the average benefit leveling off around 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight per day in the populations studied. Protein supplies the building material; resistance training gives the body a reason to use it.